Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Repository Management Relationship: Subset of Self-Depositor

Demographics / User Characteristics

  • May be administrative staff, administrator, faculty, or student
  • May hold any staff role within University or Healthcare
  • Is a content steward, but not necessarily a content creator
  • May work with a proxy or Library Deposit Supervisor to submit material 

Frequency and Type of Repository Deposit Use

  • Regularly to rarely
  • Could vary based on submitting office/program/group
  • Self-Deposit 

General Motivators / Goals

  • Ensure preservation of University intellectual output and archival assets
  • Fulfill retention requirements 

Key Deposit Tasks

  • Describe records/publication
  • Deposit records/publication
  • Identify relevant retention schedule
  • Obtain a stable link to records/publication 

Repository Content / Information Desired

  • Information on prior deposits from office/program/group for reference
  • Notification/receipt of successful submission
  • Guidance on performing a successful deposit (workflow and digital preservation)
  • Analytics / metrics of deposited works’ usage 

Repository Content / Information Deposited

  • Textual information (MS Office formats, PDF)
  • Digital images, audio, and visual formats
  • Regular if infrequent need for data and other complex objects 

Library/Unit Interactions

  • Campus Staff Submitter may be affiliated with any University or Healthcare office; works with special collections staff across campus libraries (Rose, WHSCL, Oxford, Pitts, Law)


 

  • No labels